×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

2026 Green Communities Criteria Draft

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…

Summary

All Hide

2026 Enterprise Green Communities Criteria Draft

Expand

Category 1: Integrative Design

Category 2: Location & Neighborhood Fabric

Category 3: Site Design

Category 4: Water

Category 5: Operating Energy

Category 6: Materials

Category 7: Healthy Living Environment

Category 8: Operations, Maintenance, and Resident Engagement

AI Tools

Hide

Welcome to your personal document assistant, powered by AI.

You can ask me questions and I will review the document to provide answers with page references for you. Please be patient, it might take a second and note that I might not always get it right - if you have questions it's easy to check the page sources or contact staff to clarify.

Start with a general question and then follow up with additional questions to narrow the focus of the response if needed.

What would you like to know?

Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Add comment


Comment
Same as 7.13
Comment
Language for this criterion is not specific, and requirements are not quantifiable. It will be challenging for teams to understand how to comply, and for the verifier to verify compliance.
Question
Mandatory for rehabs as well?
Comment
Isn't porcelain/ceramic tile or stone an acceptable flooring material? It is typical for bathrooms, laundry rooms, etc. which might account for more than 10% of all flooring, thus making option 1 not possible for most projects.
Comment
Options a, b, and c are not quantifiable, which might make them difficult to verify.
Question
Is this mandatory for both new construction and rehab?
This might be very challenging for rehabs where many of the proposed options might not be applicable.
Question
Define "screen". What, exactly, are teams supposed to do once they have selected the categories of materials and resources? The language for requirements here are very vague.
Also, flag that many of the materials listed among categories are typically specified much later than the early design phase.
Comment
Will Enterprise offer the training?
Comment
The general contractor has typically not been onboarded yet during early design.
Comment
It is unclear whether both 'natural ventilation' and 'shading' must be achieved to receive points, or if it's either/or.
Comment
suggesting making this optional requirement a bit stricter by requiring at least one operable windows in *each room* of each dwelling unit.
Also, note that this will be easily achieved by almost all NYC projects, making them "free" points.
Comment
It is unclear from the language if the requirement is for installation or readiness, or both.
Comment
Define "usable" roof space
Question
Street pressure might not be enough at each floor of a multifamily building - in NYC it is typically enough up to 4th floor, but not beyond that. Has the requirement changed to have an access to potable water *on each floor* of the building regardless or only on those floors where street pressure would be enough in case of an emergency?
Comment
The calculations required to demonstrate compliance with this criterion are difficult because teams might not have a good estimate of how much water can be collected from a certain roof/site square footage.
Could it be flipped by asking to achieve a minimum % of roof/site square footage from where water for reuse shall be collected?
Comment
Can 4.2 be combined with 4.1 with mandatory + optional options? Just an idea for simplification.
Question
Why not 100%? Wasn't 100% in the previous criteria? Is there a reason why some of the exterior lighting shouldn't have sensors, assuming emergency lighting are already excluded from these requirements?
Comment
Option 2 only would help with this requirement.
Also, even within option 2, clarify which level must be pursued AND, within that, if there is a minimum square footage of impervious pavement that must be achieved.
Comment
Solar Reflectance (SR) or Solar Reflectance Index (SRI)? It is helpful if all language throughout the criterion uses the same parameter.
Comment
Providing high-albedo (high SRI) roof material has nothing to do with pervious/impervious.
While impervious surface is a category that reduces the heat-island effect, it is not the only one. Terminology is a bit confusing, in this case.
Comment
Define "usable" roof space.
Comment
The information about tree canopy and other shading and whether it's 10% of the public open space will be very difficult (impossible?) to gather.
Question
Where is the "requirements" paragraph?
When/how is this mandatory?
Comment
C2.5 Option 2 would increase impervious area on site; but C2.5 Option 1 (locate near other open space offsite) does not move the ball on heat island on behalf of the project. Suggest clarifying that only C2.5 opt 2 counts for this requirement.
Comment
For the NYC Overlay please defer to Local Law 97 requirements.
Comment
Is 1.6 mandatory or optional? Making this mandatory would be burdensome and unnecessary. Newly built (and renovated) affordable housing to current codes, standards, and design requirements brings with it positive coattails for resident health.
Comment
As an experienced developer I find many of these categories performative and unhelpful. EGC has a long history of pushing project innovations in energy efficiency, technology and other qualitative and quantitative measures but much of this is just make-work. To cite a recent example, identifying the “challenges and opportunities” faced by the formerly homeless adults with serious and persistent mental illness in a 50-word text box is ludicrous. Developing affordable housing is already complicated and costly enough without creating additional paperwork burdens with limited value. In a time of escalating standards and requirements (zoning code, building code, energy code, city and state design and sustainability requirements…) I encourage Enterprise to pare down the EGC mandates to truly essential items.
Question
Are permanent generators not allowed?
Question
What is the plan if ENERGY STAR is eliminated?
Comment
Why not 100% of lighting LED?
Question
What are expectations for buildings that have unit level electrical metering - on site renewables may not be practical for individual unit level PV systems or in the case of sub metering from a large system may not be legal is some jurisdictions. Should owners be required to purchase RECs or other offsets for their tenants?
Comment
Social vulnerability index (link); minority health SVI (link);link and link may be useful resources as well
Comment
Reframe to steer users to other options?
Comment
The criteria sounds good but for who? The affordable housing program sounds good but in my opinion it's a scam like all the other programs my husband died and he was a Army Veteran so my daughter moved be in with her and my grandson. Each time we applied for the affordable housing program we got kicked in the face been homeless and In the shelter we are over the income guide lines I received social security benefits and she works and then Codv19 came lost job I like to listen to you people you talk a good game but do you really help people like a single parent with a elderly parent to take care of because of their circumstances? Yes everyone needs a decent place to live and be safe in? What about the people who are doing the right thing but circumstances put the best of people in places that they can't help and to be hurting and you still don't get the help that you really need you see the high cost of housing?
Comment
Broken link. The url is missing an x in "nextgen."
Question
What's your definition of a qualified energy rater? HERS, minimum number of years experience, etc?
NYC Overlay Comment or Question
Is this expected to be an as-of-right for NYC projects?
Comment
For NY projects, HPD and HCR require rehabs to energy model with existing conditions and utility consumption as a baseline to determine minimum 20% savings, for example. Using 90.1-2019 can provide some value, but it doesn't allow the building to see how they're actually planning to improve, and requires double work to meet HPD and HCR requirements.
Comment
Replace all references to ASCE 24-14 with ASCE 24-24 which was published in January 2025
Comment
Surgeon General report may be helpful resource, link
Comment
SAMHSA resources may be helpful link
Comment
Add National Institute of Building Science resources, link
Comment
Many very experienced developers have their own process for completion of community and tenant engagement. Our developments have not used the Green Communities model as it is too time consuming and repetitive of what we've done.